The Stanly News and Press (Albemarle, NC)

Opinion & Letters to the Editor

March 7, 2014

Look! Up there in the sky!

Thursday, March 6, 2014 — RALEIGH – As much public criticism as North Carolina lawmakers have received lately, they deserve some credit for doing something that hasn’t gotten them very much attention.

They grounded the drones.

Or, they pretty much did.

As debate rages around the country about government’s use of unmanned aircraft and when that use could violate people’s privacy rights, North Carolina legislators put a provision into the state budget that grounds their use by state and local government, in most instances, for two years.

Meanwhile, legislators are studying what kind of permanent limits might be placed on their use.

The state restrictions come as the feds have restricted unmanned aircraft’s use for commercial purposes.

The state law does allow for the state chief information officer to make exceptions, and research on their use is taking place at several locations in the state.

But without one of those exceptions, no state or local government entity can buy, operate or procure the services of anyone operating a drone or disclose personal information about anyone acquired with their use.

The word apparently had not gotten to a media nonprofit formed by several Wake County towns. It was still flying, and posting on YouTube and elsewhere, drone footage from a unmanned aircraft that it bought last fall. It stopped once contacted for a story by the N.C. Insider (for which I serve as editor).

Apparently lost on the fellow who heads up the nonprofit is just how susceptible an unmanned aircraft armed with cameras, microphones or thermal imaging devices is to misuse.

With the ability to violate the sanctity of homes or hover about private property, it is incumbent on state legislators and the federal government to come up with rules for their use.

Some law enforcement officers are urging lawmakers not to tie their hands.

One of them, Brunswick County Sheriff John Ingram, wrote to the legislative committee studying their use that no legal distinctions should be made between manned and unmanned aircraft.

He went on to write that unmanned aircraft could be deployed “more quickly and with less expense.”

Isn’t that kind of the point?

As inexpensive as the unmanned aircraft are now, and the likelihood that they will be even cheaper in the future, doesn’t that invite them to be used by government in ways that manned aircraft currently are not?

Just last week, legislative chambers in Washington and Wisconsin approved legislation that would narrowly restrict their use by state and local government without a search warrant. In the case of the Wisconsin bill, no evidence gathered by drones without a search warrant could be used as evidence in a criminal case.

The job of law enforcement is catching the bad guys. It is understandable that they would want the use of a tool that could help them do that job.

The job of protecting civil liberties falls to lawmakers and the courts.

To do that job, some kinds of restrictions on this technology are going to be required.

Scott Mooneyham is a syndicated columnist for Capitol Press Association and covers activities of the N.C. Legislature.

1
Text Only
Opinion & Letters to the Editor
  • D.G. Martin Read others’ views to be better informed, decide for yourself

    “I don’t read The Washington Post. That is not where I get my ideas.”

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Patrick Gannon This isn’t medical marijuana

    As state legislators debated allowing the use of an extract from marijuana plants to treat seizure disorders over the past couple of weeks, it was evident that social conservatives – there are many of them in the General Assembly – felt a tinge of unease about it, even as almost every one of them voted yes.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Doug Creamer Friends and contentment

    Last week I made my annual trip up the mountain to Sparta. My friends have a secluded home near a babbling brook. Their home and property are a haven for peace. It’s a two-plus hour ride to their home that doesn’t feel that long because I look so forward to my time with this great couple. When I arrive, the conversation seems to pick up right where we left it the last time we saw each other.

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Thanks for the honest deed

    I would like to thank the person that found my wallet in the parking lot of Harris Teeter on July 23 and turned it in to the Albemarle Police.

    July 29, 2014

  • cleaning supplies Don't judge mothers with messy homes

    I was building shelves in my garage when a neighbor girl, one of my 4-year-old daughter's friends, approached me and said, "I just saw in your house. It's pretty dirty. Norah's mommy needs to clean more."

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • We need your help

    Hurray for the Albemarle City Council. Council plans to battle N.C. Department of Transportation’s ranking of all 13 projects in Stanly County to the bottom of their priority list. Council is setting up petitions in various city buildings for citizens to sign.

    July 28, 2014

  • Council asks veterans to seek office

    The terms of office for the leaders of the Stanly County Veterans Council ended June 30. A call is being sent to veterans council members requesting candidates for the four elective offices of the council. A meeting has been set for 6:30 p.m. Aug. 12 at the DAV building. All council members are urged to attend.

    July 28, 2014

  • Mike Walden The gains and gaps in our economy

    Twice a year, I pull out my cloudy crystal ball and attempt to make some predictions about the direction and pace of the North Carolina economy. I just finished my latest effort and, as usual, the results are a combination of pluses and minuses.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Jason O. Boyd Yellow journalism takes on new form, people are dumber for it

    Time to get on the soapbox for a few minutes.
    Let me clear my throat. Eh ... hem!
    People are dumb.

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

  • Brent Laurenz Special election adds to the mix

    RALEIGH – A busy slate of judicial elections this November got even busier recently when Judge John Martin of the N.C. Court of Appeals announced his retirement.
    A special statewide election to fill Martin’s seat will be added to the general election ballot, joining the four N.C. Supreme Court seats and three N.C. Court of Appeals races already slated for this fall.

    July 25, 2014 1 Photo

House Ads
Seasonal Content