The Stanly News and Press (Albemarle, NC)

Opinion & Letters to the Editor

June 30, 2014

Is small now the new big?

Sunday, June 29, 2014 — As a culture, we have often celebrated bigness. The biggest fish caught, the biggest skyscraper built or even the biggest ball of twine wound (I think it’s around 12 feet in diameter) will all get our attention. It’s probably related to an attitude that more is better than less.

The triumph of big over small has – for a long time – also prevailed in the business community and for good reasons. Being a large company offered several pluses. Larger companies could take advantage of “economies of scale.” Instead of hiring a few people to do many tasks, bigger companies could hire many people, each of whom would do one or a few tasks. This allowed the old adage of “practice makes perfect” to kick in. The more someone did a task, the better he became at it, which translated into lower costs for the business.

Bigger companies could also afford to purchase more specialized and complex machinery that, again, made them more efficient, productive and profitable. Such machinery often had too high of a price tag for the “little guy” and so gave a competitive edge to “big” over “small.”

Finally, with size came a larger share of the market and an ability to use that size to the disadvantage of smaller competitors. Bigger companies can pay for a larger advertising budget, can sometimes offer “deals” the little guy can’t afford and also have the resources to survive the periodic “downs” in the economy better than smaller firms.

But these advantages of bigness may be changing. In some economic sectors, small companies are beating big firms. We may be witnessing a shift in the economic climate toward “small” being the new “big.”

Several factors – some old and some new – are behind this shift. Historically, American consumers – rightly or wrongly – have often been suspicious of big companies. This viewpoint may be a hold-over from the early 20th century, when “trusts” (we’d call them monopolies today) ruled much of the economy. We like to root for the “little guy,” maybe because most of us can identify with him. So our hearts are with small over big.

 Also, as consumer tastes and preferences change over time, small companies can frequently give us what we want more quickly than large companies. Large businesses may have to go through several layers of bureaucracy, testing and decision-making before a new product or service is rolled out. In many small companies, one person can do this.

Yet the most significant game-changer helping small firms today may be technology. Information technology can easily put a small firm in touch with both suppliers and customers half a country or world away. Small companies can do all their management tasks – accounting, payroll, taxes, etc. – using inexpensive and sometimes free programs.

This is why, despite all the recent changes and upheaval in the world economy, small companies have survived. In the 2000s, companies in the U.S. with less than 20 employees accounted for more than 85 percent of all establishments, and that percentage actually increased during the decade.

A good example of the changing economic landscape of company size is in the beer industry. In 1980, there were fewer than 100 breweries in the country. Today there are nearly 2,700, and the growth has all been due to the rise of micro-breweries. Younger beer consumers especially are flocking to these start-ups that offer twists on the traditional recipes and flavors and are tied to local areas.

Does this mean big companies are doomed? Of course not. In fact, in several industries there is a trend toward consolidation of smaller firms into larger firms. This has recently been the case in the telecommunications industry.

But in terms of small companies having the tools and ability for a “fighting chance” against the big firms on the block, that opportunity is there. Of course, there is still a high potential failure rate for a business of any size in the early years. However, failure is always an option when beginning something new and bold.

A common plot line in many popular novels and movies is the “little guy” triumphing over adversity. You decide if this is becoming more of a reality in today’s world.

 

Mike Walden is a William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor and North Carolina Cooperative Extension economist in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics of North Carolina State University’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. He teaches and writes on personal finance, economic outlook and public policy.

1
Text Only
Opinion & Letters to the Editor
  • Schyler Martin As wonderful as Ireland was, there’s just no place like home

    I expected a lot of things from my six-week study abroad program in Dublin, Ireland.
    I expected to miss family and friends, I expected to see a lot of things that I’d never seen before and I expected, more than anything else, to yearn for sweet tea. For the record, I did miss sweet tea quite terribly.

    August 1, 2014 3 Photos

  • taylor.armerding.jpg Impeachment arms Democrats, doesn't end the Obama disaster

    Republicans may have grounds to impeach President Barack Obama but they would be daft to pursue a case they cannot win in a Senate controlled by Democrats. Impeachment would only drive the Democrats' fundraising and potentially squander the GOP's best opportunity in years to capture both houses of Congress then, in two years, the White House.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • Brent Laurenz Wrangling over pay for teachers

    RALEIGH – When the N.C. General Assembly reconvened in mid-May, there was talk of a short, efficient session.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • Medical marijuana opponents' most powerful argument is at odds with a mountain of research

    Opponents of marijuana legalization are rapidly losing the battle for hearts and minds. Simply put, the public understands that however you measure the consequences of marijuana use, the drug is significantly less harmful to users and society than tobacco or alcohol.

    August 1, 2014

  • Patrick Gannon Two sides in debate about film incentives

    RALEIGH – It’s looking like the current film incentives program may be scrapped for a much different grant program for TV and movie production companies.

    August 1, 2014 1 Photo

  • D.G. Martin Read others’ views to be better informed, decide for yourself

    “I don’t read The Washington Post. That is not where I get my ideas.”

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Patrick Gannon This isn’t medical marijuana

    As state legislators debated allowing the use of an extract from marijuana plants to treat seizure disorders over the past couple of weeks, it was evident that social conservatives – there are many of them in the General Assembly – felt a tinge of unease about it, even as almost every one of them voted yes.

    July 30, 2014 1 Photo

  • Doug Creamer Friends and contentment

    Last week I made my annual trip up the mountain to Sparta. My friends have a secluded home near a babbling brook. Their home and property are a haven for peace. It’s a two-plus hour ride to their home that doesn’t feel that long because I look so forward to my time with this great couple. When I arrive, the conversation seems to pick up right where we left it the last time we saw each other.

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo

  • Thanks for the honest deed

    I would like to thank the person that found my wallet in the parking lot of Harris Teeter on July 23 and turned it in to the Albemarle Police.

    July 29, 2014

  • cleaning supplies Don't judge mothers with messy homes

    I was building shelves in my garage when a neighbor girl, one of my 4-year-old daughter's friends, approached me and said, "I just saw in your house. It's pretty dirty. Norah's mommy needs to clean more."

    July 28, 2014 1 Photo

House Ads
Seasonal Content