The Stanly News and Press (Albemarle, NC)

Opinion & Letters to the Editor

March 31, 2014

Is our inflation measured right?

Sunday, March 30, 2014 — The man’s tone was forceful, even with a tint of anger. “The government is lying to us about inflation,” he boldly stated.

“They tell us inflation is a lot lower than it really is. And they purposely don’t include products like gas and food in their calculations to fool us into thinking the economy is better.”

I was finishing a presentation to a civic group with time devoted to questions and answers when the man made his statement. Perhaps he was looking for an argument, but I turned his points into a learning lesson about the process and pitfalls of trying to calculate the nation’s inflation rate.

The federal government has been collecting price data only since the early 20th century. This was the time of the Industrial Revolution, with people moving off farms and to cities. Rather than raising and making everything they needed, families began buying more products in stores — so the prices of everyday consumer items became more important.

Like the majority of government economic statistics, information about the prices we pay is based on a sample. Yet the government’s price sample is large, covering more than 200 categories of products and services at more than 20,000 stores. Also, it is incorrect to say the government excludes food and fuel prices. These are included in the survey and in the most commonly reported inflation rate. There is a version of the inflation rate which omits food and fuel, but only because these prices are very volatile and therefore may cloud the long-run trends in inflation. Still, this version is not the government’s main price gauge.

After the government collects the individual prices, each is assigned a “weight” based on its relative importance to the average household’s budget. So, for example, gas has a bigger weight than men’s ties. A weighted average price is then calculated, and the inflation rate for a year is the percentage difference between this year’s average price and last year’s average price.

It’s important to understand this calculated inflation rate is based on the spending pattern of the “average” consumer.  But, of course, no one is exactly “average.” So, to the extent your purchases are unique and different from the “average,” then official inflation rates may be higher or lower than what you experience.

The government’s statisticians generating the inflation rate face three big challenges: One is that the collection of products and services people purchase changes over time. New products are introduced and others are discarded. Computers replaced typewriters, and cell phones are rapidly taking the place of landlines. Also, how and where people buy things change. Today, many more purchases are made online and at “big-box” stores than in the past. Over time, the government makes changes to keep up with the trends, but the adjustments can take time.

A second challenge arises when people change how much of a product they buy in reaction to a price change. Let’s say gas prices rise. In response, most motorists will purchase fewer gallons. This means the “weight” — the relative importance of gas prices to all other prices — may change. The government has a version of the inflation rate which attempts to account for this somewhat subtle — yet still important — impact.

Perhaps the biggest challenge — and the one with the most controversial solution — is how to deal with quality changes in products. For example, standard features on most new vehicles today include air conditioning, power windows, CD player, and air bags — all items I didn’t have on my first car, a 1956 Oldsmobile. So it would be unfair to include the cost of these features in the inflation rate for car prices between 1956 and today, because they represent improvements in the quality of vehicles.

The government agrees, and therefore it employs a statistical technique to remove the costs of new features so that the remaining price of the product allows an “apples to apples” comparison to earlier versions. It’s an imperfect technique, but without it the inflation rate wouldn’t only mean paying more for the same thing, but in part would mean paying more for a better thing.

And by the way, for the cost of owning a home — which is actually very complex, because a home is both something we use, as well as an investment — the government estimates the price per square foot if the home was rented.

The government releases several inflation rates each month, differing slightly by the kinds of specific methods used to address the above issues. For 2013, the rates showed a range between 1 percent and 1.5 percent for the annual inflation rate.

 But there’s a private alternative to the government numbers. A couple of years ago, some economists at MIT decided to make use of the massive amounts of price data now available online to calculate their own inflation rate. They call this effort the “Billion Prices Project,” and it’s become a popular “check” to the prices and inflation rates published by the federal government. For 2013, the Billion Prices Project inflation rate came in at 2 percent.

So is there a logical and defensible way to estimate the inflation rate? Along with my skeptical friend at the civic meeting, you’ll have to decide.

 

Mike Walden is a William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor and North Carolina Cooperative Extension economist in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics of North Carolina State University. He writes on personal finance, economic outlook and public policy.

1
Text Only
Opinion & Letters to the Editor
  • Brent Laurenz Special election adds to the mix

    RALEIGH – A busy slate of judicial elections this November got even busier recently when Judge John Martin of the N.C. Court of Appeals announced his retirement.
    A special statewide election to fill Martin’s seat will be added to the general election ballot, joining the four N.C. Supreme Court seats and three N.C. Court of Appeals races already slated for this fall.

    July 25, 2014 1 Photo

  • Patrick Gannon Fake news or sign of some more trouble?

    RALEIGH – Of the three situations I can recall where agencies receiving large sums of taxpayer dollars wouldn’t divulge employees’ salaries, two of them ended badly. The third – involving a group of charter schools in Southeastern North Carolina – is playing out right now.

    July 25, 2014 1 Photo

  • Almost half of America's obese youth don't know they're obese

    WASHINGTON - The good news is that after decades of furious growth, obesity rates finally seem to be leveling off in the U.S.. The bad news is that America's youth still appear to be dangerously unaware of the problem.

    July 23, 2014

  • Darth Vader is polling higher than all potential 2016 presidential candidates

    On the other hand, with a net favorability of -8, Jar Jar is considerably more popular than the U.S. Congress, which currently enjoys a net favorability rating of -65.

    July 23, 2014

  • D.G. Martin Where did all these new voters in North Carolina come from?

    “Voters born elsewhere make up nearly half of N.C. electorate.”
    So begins the latest DataNet report from the UNC Program on Public Life, directed by former journalist Ferrel Guillory.

    July 23, 2014 1 Photo

  • Patrick Gannon Some light for Dems in their time of darkness

    RALEIGH – Earlier this year, state Sen. Ben Clark, a Hoke County Democrat, became a hero for a day among his party and environmentalists when his amendment to require more well water testing near future fracking sites passed the Senate. It even gained the support of a number of GOP senators, against the wishes of the Republican bill sponsor.

    July 23, 2014 1 Photo

  • mama.jpg What we get wrong about millennials living at home

    If the media is to be believed, America is facing a major crisis. "Kids," some age 25, 26, or even 30 years old, are living out of their childhood bedrooms and basements at alarmingly high numbers. The hand-wringing overlooks one problem: It's all overblown.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Doug Creamer Maintaining hope

    Gardeners are facing challenges with the weather this year. It seemed like we were getting great conditions in April and May. The weather was warm and we were getting some good rains. Then sometime in June the rain stopped. It got so dry that I didn’t have to cut the grass. While I enjoyed the break, the garden was not happy at all. I was having to water quite a bit to keep the vegetable garden alive and growing.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Jason O. Boyd I may be a bit behind the times, but at least I can find ‘America’

    I seem to be reading about and dealing with technology a lot lately.
    I  love technology and have always been fascinated by gadgets of all kinds and the wonderful things they can do. You never seem to go through an entire day without some form of invention enhancing your life.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Brent Laurenz Meeting out in open helps negotiations move ahead

    RALEIGH – State lawmakers reconvened in Raleigh on May 14 promising a brief legislative session this summer, but as July moves along they are still in town and tackling big issues.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

House Ads
Seasonal Content